Web3 is the next phase of the internet, built on blockchain technology, where control shifts from centralized platforms to decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Instead of relying on intermediaries, users interact directly through smart contracts and decentralized applications. DAOs are a natural extension of this model, utilizing the transparency and security of blockchain networks to coordinate decision-making, manage resources, and enforce governance rules without relying on traditional hierarchies.
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have become one of the most significant experiments in blockchain technology and Web3, fostering collaboration among diverse participants. With billions of dollars in capital under management, these digital-first organizations are reshaping how people coordinate, govern, and allocate resources, without relying on traditional corporate structures.
Behind every DAO is a technical architecture and advanced technology that makes this possible. Understanding the five layers that support these organizations is essential for anyone who wants to participate, build, or simply grasp how decentralized governance can contribute to sustainability.
DAOs function through a layered system that ensures coordination, scalability, transparency, and automation. Each layer plays a distinct role, and together they form the backbone of decentralized governance.
The physical layer encompasses the servers, nodes, and network infrastructure that enable the system to operate. These nodes validate transactions, store copies of the ledger, and maintain security. The more geographically distributed the infrastructure, the more resilient the DAO becomes against censorship or single points of failure.
For some DAOs, this layer also encompasses real-world assets under management, including property or equipment. A real estate DAO, for example, might collectively own buildings that are governed digitally but exist physically.
The ledger layer records all transactions, governance decisions, and token balances. Once data is written to the ledger, it cannot be altered. This immutability creates trust among participants who may never meet in person.
The choice of ledger technology is crucial, particularly for recording and processing transactions. Public blockchain, such as Ethereum, provides transparency and strong decentralization, but can face congestion and high transaction fees. Private or consortium networks may offer faster processing but with less decentralization. The ledger also stores governance tokens that represent voting rights, enabling members to demonstrate participation without relying on a central registry. This distributed storage system ensures that all governance data remains accessible to authorized users while maintaining security.
The middleware layer bridges the blockchain with external data sources. Oracles are the most common tool here, fetching and verifying information from outside the blockchain. Since smart contracts cannot access external data directly, oracles provide the inputs needed for automated decisions.
For example, a renewable energy DAO might use oracles to track energy production, carbon credit prices, or weather conditions. This data could trigger smart contracts to adjust investments or distribute rewards. The accuracy of oracles is critical, since bad data can cause contracts to execute incorrectly. Many DAOs use decentralized oracle networks to reduce this risk.
The application layer is where members interact with the DAO through user-friendly, peer-to-peer interfaces. This includes web portals, mobile apps, and wallet integrations that enable members to vote, submit proposals, and monitor their treasury balances. Communication platforms like Discord or governance forums foster active participation, enabling discussion and community building before formal votes take place.
User experience at this layer has a direct impact on participation. If interfaces are confusing or overly technical, members may disengage. Well-designed applications make governance accessible and encourage broader community involvement.
The business layer is where the DAO’s purpose comes to life. This includes governance processes, investment decisions, community initiatives, and any other activities that fulfill the organization’s mission and provide a benefit to its members.
For an investment DAO, this might mean voting on which projects to fund. For a gaming DAO, it could involve developing new games or managing virtual assets. The effectiveness of this layer depends on how well governance rules are designed and how efficiently resources are allocated.
Consider “TechFound DAO,” a hypothetical organization dedicated to funding blockchain research and development. Its Physical Layer runs on a private DAG network with validator nodes across multiple countries. The ledger layer records all votes and treasury transactions, with smart contracts automatically releasing funds when proposals reach 60% approval.
The middleware layer integrates oracles that provide market data and research metrics. The application layer offers a web portal for proposals, Discord for discussion, and mobile apps for quick voting. At the business layer, members propose and fund research projects, with smart contracts tracking deliverables and distributing funds.
To address compliance, TechFound DAO operates through a Wyoming DAO LLC wrapper, giving it legal recognition and reducing tax risks for members. This example shows how the five layers integrate into a functioning, legally aware DAO.
DAOs face significant legal uncertainty. Traditional laws assume centralized control and clear jurisdiction, which conflict with decentralized structures. Some jurisdictions, like Wyoming, have created DAO LLC statutes to provide legal clarity. The Coalition of Automated Legal Applications (COALA) has also proposed model legislation to recognize DAOs as unique entities.
Tax treatment remains unsettled. Questions about whether DAOs should be taxed as partnerships, corporations, or something new are still unresolved. Cross-border operations add further complexity, especially with anti-money laundering and securities regulations. Identity verification requirements often clash with the pseudonymous nature of DAO participation, though privacy-preserving technologies may help bridge this gap.
The five-layer model will continue to evolve and could become widely adopted in various sectors. As developers continue their efforts to improve interoperability between blockchains and enhance automation capabilities, DAOs initiated by forward-thinking companies are becoming more sophisticated. Interoperability between blockchains, more advanced automation, and privacy-preserving governance tools are already reshaping how DAOs operate.
As legal frameworks mature, DAOs may gain clearer recognition as autonomous entities, enhancing their scalability and further expanding their role in the decentralized web. Many of these improvements have been developed through collaborative efforts among technology companies and blockchain developers working to expand the capabilities of decentralized applications.
If you’re building or participating in a DAO, the legal and tax implications can be just as complex as the technology itself. Whether you’re exploring Crypto LLCs and Web3 Startup structures or need guidance on business formation strategies, Allegis Law helps founders, investors, and communities structure DAOs in ways that support decentralized governance while avoiding hidden tax traps and compliance issues.
Schedule a consultation with Allegis Law today to discuss how to align your DAO with legal and tax requirements, protect participants, and build a sustainable foundation for growth.
©
2025
Allegis Law, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
